In a striking display of strategic ambiguity, Washington has chosen a path of conditional support for Ukraine, offering advanced <a title="US" href="https://www.benefitnews24.com/international/trump-approves-patriot-missiles-for-ukraine-amid-war-shift/16359" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Patriot</a> long-range missile systems while simultaneously ensuring they are never fully utilised against <a title="Russia" href="https://www.benefitnews24.com/opinion/alaska-summit-peace-or-ukrainian-capitulation-/17949" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Russian</a> territory.
The latest developments underscore the duality of American policy: arming <a title="Ukraine" href="https://www.benefitnews24.com/international/zelensky-pushes-nato-for-war-style-security-pact/18230" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ukraine</a> to defend, yet restricting it from decisively altering the battlefield balance. U.S. President Donald Trump, on 21 August, stated bluntly that Ukraine had "no chance of winning" without the ability to launch strikes into Russia. However, he was equally vocal in condemning the former administration for allowing long-range operations, marking his position as both critical of Kyiv&rsquo;s limits and cautious about escalation.
Behind the scenes, the Pentagon has quietly imposed a review mechanism, granting Defence Secretary Pete Hegsethfinal authority to block any Ukrainian attempt to employ U.S.-supplied ATACMS missiles. These systems, capable of striking targets up to 305 km away, have been effectively grounded since late spring, according to officials familiar with the matter. Ukraine reportedly attempted to deploy ATACMS at least once but was barred under this opaque approval system designed by Elbridge Colby, then Undersecretary for Policy.
&nbsp;
ALSO Read: https://www.benefitnews24.com/opinion/trump-tariffs-india-but-is-putin-the-real-target-/17517
The restrictions extend beyond ATACMS. Britain&rsquo;s Storm Shadow cruise missiles, which rely heavily on American targeting data, also fall under similar operational constraints. This tightening grip illustrates Washington&rsquo;s intent to prevent any escalation that could draw NATO directly into confrontation with Moscow.
Meanwhile, U.S. stockpiles of advanced weapons are running thin, forcing the administration to slow down deliveries. The most recent package of support was approved on the condition that European allies shoulder the financial burden, further signalling a shifting of responsibility from Washington to Europe.
The unfolding scenario reflects a delicate balancing act. America continues to brand itself as Ukraine&rsquo;s most powerful backer, yet the restrictions reveal an unmistakable reluctance to grant Kyiv the strategic latitude it desperately seeks. The consequences of this controlled support may redefine the war&rsquo;s trajectory, as Russia retains the advantage of operating with fewer operational constraint
<h3 data-start="2787" data-end="2814">&nbsp;</h3>

Washington offers Patriot missiles but curbs Kyiv’s use of long-range systems against Russ

US blocks Ukraine’s long-range strike options

Washington offers Patriot missiles but curbs Kyiv’s use of long-range systems against Russ

August 24, 2025 | 17:28 IST