Shyam Plastic Industries Right

Parth Engineers & Consultant Right

Versatile Solution Bottom

Parth Engineers & Consultant Bottom

Shyam Plastic Industries Bottom

Versatile Solution Right

Benefit-top add-1

Benefit-top add-2

Benefit-top add-3

The final dispatch from Pouria Hamidi arrived not as a manifesto, but as a haunting digital ghost. In a video lasting precisely ten minutes and 44 seconds, the young man from the southern port city of Bushehr delivered his last words to a world he felt had already looked away. "If you are watching this, then I am not around anymore," he began, his voice a steady, chilling anchor in a sea of hopelessness.
Hamidi&rsquo;s death by suicide, following the release of his footage, has sent a seismic shock through the Iranian diaspora and the fractured streets of Tehran. His plea was singular: he begged US President Donald Trump to abandon current diplomatic overtures toward the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. He spoke of a "massacre" that he claimed has claimed 40,000 lives a figure reflecting the raw, unventilated trauma of a population living under an iron heel.
<h3 data-path-to-node="4">The Broken Promise of Resistance</h3>
Hamidi&rsquo;s video is more than a tragedy; it is an indictment. He directly referenced the rhetoric of the Trump administration, stating that Iranians had "trusted him" when told to keep protesting. The betrayal felt by the liberal youth of Iran is palpable. For years, the promise of American support ranging from "maximum pressure" to the veiled threat of military intervention fuelled the fire of domestic dissent.
&nbsp;
<video controls="controls" width="300" height="150">
<source src="https://ibp-benefits.s3.us-east-005.backblazeb2.com/prod/news/uploads/videos/1770697247406_i0KSW53x79mMcEOI.mp4.mp4" type="video/mp4"></video>
However, as the reality of geopolitics shifts, that fire is being met with a bucket of cold water. Washington&rsquo;s recent pivot to indirect talks in Oman has left many protesters feeling like pawns in a nuclear chess match. When the rhetoric of "regime change" is replaced by the pragmatic language of "deal-making," the people on the ground are left exposed. To Hamidi, and many like him, a deal is not diplomacy; it is a betrayal of the blood spilled in the streets.
<h3 data-path-to-node="7">A State Divided: Orthodox vs Liberal</h3>
The question remains: if the regime is so despised, why has it not collapsed? The answer lies in the deep, structural fractures of Iranian society. Iran is not a monolith. While the urban middle class and the youth yearn for a liberal, secular future, a significant portion of the population remains tethered to the orthodox status quo.
The state is effectively divided. On one side stands the authoritarian orthodox government, backed by the formidable Revolutionary Guard and a rural base that relies on the regime's distributive networks. On the other are the liberals now the primary victims of a systematic crackdown. The regime has mastered the art of "containment governance," using selective violence and internet blackouts to ensure that dissent remains fragmented.
<h3 data-path-to-node="10">The Mirage of Foreign Salvation</h3>
America&rsquo;s interest has always been surgical: the nuclear programme and regional stability. The "false promise" of supporting a revolution was often a rhetorical tool to bring the clerical leadership to the table. For the liberal youth, this has been a hard lesson in realism. They are caught between a government that views them as threats to national security and a superpower that views them as leverage.
Hamidi&rsquo;s support for the exiled Prince Reza Pahlavi and his call for foreign intervention highlight the desperation of a movement that knows it cannot win against a modern, armed autocracy with bare hands.
<h3 data-path-to-node="14">Where Does Iran Go Now?</h3>
We are witnessing the "normalisation" of dissent. The protests have been iterative stress tests, but without a unified domestic leadership or a total collapse of the security apparatus, the Islamic Republic remains resilient. The current path leads toward a grim stalemate.
Washington will likely pursue a "nuclear-focused" concession, leaving the domestic repression of Iranians as a "secondary issue." This ensures the regime&rsquo;s survival while ostensibly checking its atomic ambitions. For the youth of Iran, the future looks much like the present: a lonely struggle in a torn state, where the only thing more dangerous than the regime&rsquo;s wrath is the false hope of foreign rescue.

Trump and Khamenei: A complex diplomatic duel

A nation in mourning as Washington pivots from firebrand rhetoric to Oman talks

Iranian Man Dies by Suicide After Video Plea

Iran on Sunday announced that it has designated the armed forces of European countries as terrorist groups, escalating tensions with the European Union after the bloc classified the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organisation.
The announcement was made by Iran&rsquo;s parliament speaker during a legislative session marked by strong symbolism. Lawmakers wore green uniforms associated with the IRGC and staged a show of solidarity, condemning Europe&rsquo;s decision. The move was justified under a domestic law passed in 2019 that allows Iran to respond to foreign designations against the Guards.
Iranian leaders criticised the European Union&rsquo;s action as irresponsible and politically motivated, accusing the bloc of acting under pressure from the United States and Israel. They claimed the decision would further marginalise Europe&rsquo;s global influence while strengthening domestic support for the IRGC.
The declaration comes amid heightened geopolitical tensions following the EU&rsquo;s move to label the IRGC a terrorist organisation over its role in suppressing protests in Iran. Western governments have accused the Guards of orchestrating violent crackdowns that resulted in thousands of deaths, allegations Tehran has rejected, blaming unrest on foreign-backed militant activities.
The parliamentary session coincided with the anniversary of the return of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini from exile, a pivotal moment in the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The IRGC remains a powerful ideological and military force within Iran, tasked with defending the foundations of the Islamic republic.
The standoff unfolds as Iran and the United States continue to exchange warnings over potential military action, even as both sides signal openness to dialogue. Washington has reinforced its military presence in the region, while Iranian officials have indicated willingness to engage in talks under specific conditions.
Regional diplomatic efforts are also underway to reduce tensions. Iran has held discussions with regional leaders, including Qatar and Egypt, as concerns grow over the risk of escalation. Meanwhile, anxiety among Iranian citizens has increased, with many closely following developments amid fears of conflict.

Iran hits back after EU labels Revolutionary Guards a terrorist organisation

Iran Brands European Armies as Terror Groups

<h3 data-start="202" data-end="257">Diplomacy Talk Amid Rising Firepower</h3>
US President Donald Trump has claimed that Iran is &ldquo;ready to talk&rdquo; even as American warships, submarines and an aircraft carrier strike group move into operational range in the Middle East. The assertion, however, stands in stark contrast to the tone from Tehran, where senior officials continue to warn of &ldquo;all-out war&rdquo; if Washington launches a military strike.
There has been no official confirmation from Iran that it has sought negotiations. Instead, Iran&rsquo;s foreign ministry and military leadership have repeatedly stressed that the country will respond to any aggression with a &ldquo;comprehensive and regret-inducing&rdquo; retaliation.
The contradiction between Washington&rsquo;s messaging and Tehran&rsquo;s posture has deepened uncertainty across the region, fuelling fears that diplomacy may be little more than a tactical cover for military pressure.
<h3 data-start="1127" data-end="1173">Trump&rsquo;s Claims and Strategic Messaging</h3>
Speaking this week, Trump said the United States had dispatched a large naval presence close to Iran and claimed this had prompted Tehran to seek a deal. He suggested that Iranian officials had reached out &ldquo;on numerous occasions&rdquo; and that Washington remained open to talks if Iran accepted known conditions.
Yet, crucially, the US president has not clarified what kind of deal is being discussed whether related to Iran&rsquo;s nuclear programme, internal repression, regional militancy, or all of the above. This lack of clarity has left allies, adversaries and observers struggling to decipher the real intent behind the statements.
A senior US official echoed the line that America is &ldquo;open for business&rdquo; diplomatically, while also stressing that the deployment of forces continues.
<h3 data-start="1973" data-end="2004">Iran&rsquo;s Defiant Response</h3>
Iranian leaders have chosen a very different tone. The foreign ministry has publicly dismissed the arrival of US naval power as irrelevant to Iran&rsquo;s determination to defend itself. Military commanders have stated that Iran&rsquo;s capabilities are not merely defensive but designed to shape the balance of power in the region.
Symbolism has also played its part. In central Tehran, a new billboard depicts an American aircraft carrier under attack, accompanied by a warning that aggression will bring severe consequences. State-linked messaging continues to emphasise that Iran will not be coerced by threats of force.
<h3 data-start="2630" data-end="2677">Regional Actors Signal Escalation Risks</h3>
The broader region is also responding. Iran-aligned armed groups have begun issuing warnings of their own. Signals from Houthi leadership in Yemen indicate readiness to resume attacks on shipping routes, while Iraqi paramilitary factions have warned that any strike on Iran could ignite a region-wide conflict.
Such developments underline the reality that any military action against Iran would not remain confined to bilateral confrontation. It could rapidly expand into a multi-front crisis affecting the Red Sea, the Gulf, Iraq, Syria and beyond.
<h3 data-start="3244" data-end="3290">Background: A Pattern of Mixed Signals</h3>
This is not the first time Trump has adopted sharply shifting positions on Iran. Over recent weeks, his rhetoric has oscillated between threatening decisive action, suggesting regime change, expressing concern over executions of protesters, and then declaring that intervention may not be necessary.
Washington previously hinted at supporting alternative Iranian leadership figures, before stepping back. It also signalled possible military strikes, only to later suggest that restraint was preferable. This pattern of contradictory messaging has become a defining feature of the current standoff.
Calculated Confusion or Strategic Pressure?
The central question remains: Is Trump playing a strategic game of deception, or is US policy genuinely unsettled?
One interpretation is that this is deliberate psychological pressure&nbsp;a tactic designed to keep Tehran uncertain, force Iranian decision-makers into costly defensive preparations, and create internal confusion about whether diplomacy or confrontation lies ahead. By publicly alternating between threats and offers of talks, Washington may be attempting to destabilise Iran&rsquo;s strategic calculations.
Another possibility is that the messaging reflects genuine divisions within the US administration, where military, diplomatic and political considerations are pulling in different directions. The lack of a clearly articulated end goal strengthens this view.
What is undeniable is that the current approach carries serious risks. If Iran interprets the US posture as preparation for a surprise strike, it may choose to act pre-emptively through its regional allies. Equally, if Washington believes Tehran is bluffing, miscalculation could prove catastrophic.
For now, the region remains trapped in a tense waiting game with fleets deployed, rhetoric hardening, and diplomacy claimed but not confirmed. In such an environment,&nbsp;ambiguity itself becomes a weapon, and the margin for error grows dangerously thin.

US claims Tehran wants talks as warships close in, but Iran signals readiness for war

Trump’s Iran Gambit: Talk, Threat, or Trap?

Tensions between Iran and the United States have sharply escalated this week, triggering international concern, even as mass protests inside Iran appear to have slowed after a severe government crackdown. The renewed confrontation follows warnings from Washington and strong retaliatory signals from Tehran.
US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that American naval warships were being moved closer to the region as a precautionary step. He earlier suggested that a large naval force was heading towards Iran, signalling the possibility of military action if the situation deteriorates further.
Iran responded with a firm warning. Revolutionary Guard commander General Mohammad Pakpour said Iran&rsquo;s armed forces were on high alert and fully prepared to carry out orders if threatened, underscoring rising tensions involving both the United States and Israel.
Amid the standoff, Iran&rsquo;s ambassador to India publicly thanked New Delhi for opposing a resolution at the United Nations Human Rights Council that sought increased monitoring of Iran&rsquo;s human rights situation. Ambassador Mohammad Fathali described India&rsquo;s vote as a principled and firm stand taken during a sensitive period marked by Iran-US tensions and global scrutiny over Iran&rsquo;s handling of recent protests.
The protests began in late December, driven by economic distress and the sharp devaluation of Iran&rsquo;s currency, the rial. As demonstrations spread, authorities imposed what many described as the longest and most extensive internet shutdown in the country&rsquo;s history, significantly restricting communication and the circulation of images. While some internet access has since been restored, limitations remain.
Human rights activists claim that at least 5,000 people were killed during the crackdown, allegations that Iranian authorities have not officially acknowledged. By early January, visible protests appeared to decline, largely due to the communications blackout that reduced information emerging from the country.
The situation intensified again after Trump remarked on deploying US naval assets. A US Navy official confirmed that the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and accompanying warships are currently positioned in the Indian Ocean, though details of their mission remain undisclosed.
Meanwhile, concerns have also emerged over the Trump administration&rsquo;s decision to resume deportation flights to Iran. The National Iranian American Council said deportations are set to restart despite ongoing unrest. According to reports, a flight carrying around 40 Iranian migrants is scheduled to depart from Phoenix, Arizona, marking the first such deportation since the mass protests began.
Advocacy groups have criticised the move, warning that deported individuals could face serious risks upon return as Iran continues to grapple with political and social instability.

Naval warnings, protest crackdown and deportations deepen Iran-US standoff

Iran-US Tensions Rise as India Backs Tehran at UN

Iran has declared it is prepared for an &ldquo;all-out war&rdquo; if the United States launches a first strike, responding to Washington&rsquo;s decision to move a powerful naval armada into the Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea. The statement follows comments by US President Donald Trump that a fleet is on its way to the region and that he &ldquo;hopes he does not have to use it&rdquo;, a remark widely interpreted by regional capitals as a direct warning to Tehran.
The military posturing comes at a moment of acute internal pressure on Iran&rsquo;s ruling establishment. Protests across several cities, driven by economic hardship, political repression and anger against the clerical leadership, have exposed deep fractures within Iranian society. Washington has cited alleged &ldquo;atrocities&rdquo; against protesters as one of the reasons behind its sharpened tone, escalating from sanctions and diplomatic isolation to open military signalling.
Tehran&rsquo;s leadership, however, appears determined to project strength rather than vulnerability. Senior Iranian officials have publicly stated that the country will not submit to threats and that any attack on its territory will trigger a response &ldquo;across the region&rdquo;. This is not mere rhetoric. Over decades, Iran has invested heavily in asymmetric warfare capabilities: ballistic missiles, armed drones, cyber units and, crucially, a network of allied militias stretching from Iraq and Syria to Lebanon and Yemen.
The central question now being asked in diplomatic and security circles is stark: can Iran fight the United States and Israel single-handedly? In conventional terms, the answer is no. The combined air, naval and technological superiority of the US and Israel would overwhelm Iran&rsquo;s regular forces in a direct state-to-state confrontation. American aircraft carriers, stealth bombers and precision strike capabilities could degrade Iran&rsquo;s infrastructure within days.
Yet warfare in West Asia rarely remains conventional. Iran&rsquo;s real strength lies in its ability to widen the battlefield. Hezbollah in Lebanon, Shiite militias in Iraq, the Houthis in Yemen and allied groups in Syria all provide Tehran with leverage. A conflict could rapidly spread to multiple fronts, threatening Israel&rsquo;s northern border, destabilising Iraq, and endangering shipping lanes through the Strait of Hormuz and the Bab el-Mandeb. Even limited disruption to maritime traffic in the Arabian Sea and the Persian Gulf would send shockwaves through global energy markets.
There is also the political dimension. An external attack could, paradoxically, rally sections of the Iranian population around the flag, blunting the momentum of domestic protests. Tehran&rsquo;s strategists are well aware of this dynamic and may calculate that defiance serves both internal and external objectives.
For Washington, the risks are equally severe. A strike intended as a show of force could spiral into a prolonged regional conflict, dragging in allies, imperilling global trade routes and triggering economic instability. The movement of warships into the Arabian Sea is therefore not just a military manoeuvre but a geopolitical gamble.
As the armada advances and Tehran hardens its stance, the region stands at a perilous crossroads. The next move&mdash;whether restraint or retaliation&mdash;will shape the strategic landscape of West Asia for years to come.

US warship Abraham Lincoln in Arabian Sea

US warships advance to Arabian Sea; Tehran warns of full retaliation amid unrest

Iran Signals All-Out War as US Armada Moves

A new report citing doctors working on the ground in Iran has claimed that at least 16,500 protesters have been killed and nearly 3,30,000 injured during the Iranian government&rsquo;s crackdown on weeks of nationwide demonstrations that began over economic grievances and escalated into calls for regime change.
The figures emerged as Iran&rsquo;s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, for the first time since the unrest began, publicly acknowledged the scale of the violence, stating on Saturday that the protests resulted in &ldquo;several thousand&rdquo; deaths.
Addressing the unrest, Khamenei accused the United States of instigating the protests, alleging that US President Donald Trump openly encouraged demonstrators and offered military support. He described Trump as a criminal and claimed the protesters were acting as instruments of foreign powers.
Doctors across Iran documented widespread use of military-grade weapons against civilians. The report estimates that between 16,500 and 18,000 people were killed and 330,000 to 360,000 injured, including children and pregnant women. Most victims are believed to be under the age of 30.
Professor Amir Parasta, an Iranian-German eye surgeon and medical director of Munich MED, said hospitals are treating severe gunshot and shrapnel wounds to the head, neck and chest. He said the scale and nature of injuries point to systematic and excessive force by security agencies.
Medical data collected from eight major eye hospitals and 16 emergency departments indicates that between 700 and 1,000 people have lost an eye. One hospital in Tehran alone reportedly treated nearly 7,000 eye injury cases.
The report also highlighted deaths caused by shortages of blood supplies. In several hospitals, doctors and staff donated their own blood to save patients, while in some instances, security forces allegedly blocked blood transfusions.
In contrast, the US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA) has verified 3,090 deaths so far, including 2,885 protesters, along with more than 22,000 arrests, underscoring the difficulty of independently confirming figures amid restrictions.
Professor Parasta described the situation as a &ldquo;genocide under digital darkness,&rdquo; alleging that authorities vowed to continue killings until the protests stopped.
Doctors reportedly communicated with international media using Elon Musk&rsquo;s Starlink satellite internet service, which has helped bypass state-imposed internet shutdowns. SpaceX recently made the service free for users in Iran, turning the company into a key player in the country&rsquo;s information battle.
For weeks, Iran faced widespread internet blackouts that restricted communication, limited access to the outside world and obscured the full extent of the crackdown on protesters.

Doctors cite mass casualties as Khamenei admits thousands died in crackdown

Iran Protests: Report Claims 16,500 Killed

Iran&rsquo;s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Saturday launched a sharp attack on US President Donald Trump, calling him a criminal and accusing the United States of being responsible for casualties and damage suffered by Iranians during recent nationwide protests.
In a post on social media platform X, Khamenei held the US president responsible for what he described as deaths, destruction and misinformation targeting the Iranian nation amid weeks of unrest.
The remarks come after one of the largest waves of protests Iran has witnessed in decades. At least 3,428 protesters are reported to have been killed during the demonstrations, though rights groups believe the actual toll could be significantly higher. The protests eventually subsided following a violent crackdown by security forces and the imposition of a nationwide internet blackout.
The unrest began in late December with economic grievances, including inflation and unemployment, and was initially marked by the shutdown of Tehran&rsquo;s historic bazaar on December 28. The movement quickly escalated into a broader uprising demanding the removal of Iran&rsquo;s clerical establishment that has governed the country since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
During the protests, Trump publicly expressed support for demonstrators and encouraged them to continue, while also declining to rule out possible military intervention. Iran responded sharply to the US stance, warning that American military bases in the region would be considered legitimate targets in the event of any attack on Iranian territory.
The confrontation has further heightened tensions between Tehran and Washington amid growing international concern over human rights violations during the protests.

Iran’s supreme leader blames US for deaths and damage during nationwide unrest

Khamenei Calls Trump Criminal Amid Iran Protests

A Delhi-bound IndiGo flight from Tbilisi in Georgia narrowly crossed Iranian airspace moments before Tehran abruptly shut down most of its skies, highlighting the growing disruption to international aviation caused by the sudden move.
IndiGo flight 6E1808 departed Tbilisi late on Wednesday night and flew over Iran around 2.35 am on Thursday, eventually landing in Delhi at 7.03 am. Aviation tracking data suggests the aircraft was likely the last non-Iranian commercial flight to transit Iranian airspace before aviation authorities issued a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) enforcing the closure.
The shutdown came amid escalating protests across Iran, which intensified after unrest began on December 28. The decision led to the suspension of most international flights, allowing only a limited number of approved services, and forced airlines worldwide to rapidly alter routes or cancel operations.
The closure has significantly affected Indian carriers operating westbound routes. IndiGo has cancelled its Mumbai&ndash;Tbilisi and Tbilisi&ndash;Mumbai flights scheduled for Friday due to the restricted airspace. Other airlines, including Air India and SpiceJet, have also issued advisories asking passengers to check flight statuses and opt for rescheduling or refunds where necessary.
IndiGo stated that the disruptions were beyond its control and assured passengers of assistance. Air India said flights that can avoid the restricted zone are being rerouted, though delays are expected, while services unable to bypass Iranian airspace have been cancelled.
Iran lies on a key aviation corridor connecting Europe, Central Asia and South Asia. Any sudden restriction forces airlines to take longer alternative routes, increasing flight times, fuel consumption and operational strain. The impact extends to multiple international routes, including those linking India with the Caucasus and parts of Europe.
Airlines and passengers are closely monitoring developments, with travellers advised to regularly check official airline updates before departure.

Tbilisi–Delhi flight passes Iran just before sudden airspace closure

IndiGo Flight Beats Iran Airspace Shutdown

<h3 data-start="212" data-end="282">Tehran on Edge as War Fears Ground Flights and Tighten Control</h3>
&nbsp;
Tehran briefly disappeared from the world&rsquo;s aviation map this week. For nearly five hours, Iran&rsquo;s airspace was abruptly restricted, forcing airlines to cancel, reroute or delay flights and deepening public anxiety that a US military strike could be imminent.
The suspension, imposed at short notice late Wednesday evening local time, applied to almost all flights except those granted specific permission by Iran&rsquo;s civil aviation authorities. Though the restriction was later lifted, the episode has left airlines wary and passengers shaken. Several foreign carriers have already reduced or suspended operations, while most international flights continue to avoid Iranian skies altogether, citing the risk of miscalculation, air-defence activity and potential missile launches.
Aviation experts warn that such stop-start restrictions often indicate heightened military readiness rather than routine security drills. For ordinary Iranians, the closure reinforced a growing sense that the country is edging closer to open confrontation.
<h4 data-start="1418" data-end="1457">Security Clampdown Inside Iran</h4>
Across major cities, the state has visibly expanded the deployment of security forces. Residents in Tehran, Shiraz and Isfahan describe conditions resembling a &ldquo;de facto curfew&rdquo;, with checkpoints, heavy patrols and aggressive monitoring of neighbourhoods. The ongoing internet and communications disruption has further isolated citizens, making reliable information scarce and fuelling rumours.
These measures come against the backdrop of the largest wave of anti-government unrest in years, driven by economic collapse, political repression and public anger towards the ruling establishment. The leadership&rsquo;s fear is no longer limited to foreign intervention; it is equally focused on domestic instability.
<h4 data-start="2185" data-end="2237">Washington Signals Force, But Seeks Control</h4>
In Washington, President Donald Trump has adopted a dual tone &mdash; publicly suggesting that killings inside Iran may have subsided, while privately signalling to advisers that any military action must be swift, devastating, and limited in duration. The objective, according to officials familiar with internal discussions, is to avoid a prolonged regional war while delivering a blow severe enough to shake the foundations of the regime.
On the ground, however, preparations suggest that escalation is being taken seriously. The United States has begun withdrawing non-essential personnel from key regional bases, including the strategically vital facility in Qatar. Diplomatic missions have issued fresh travel advisories, and American staff in sensitive locations have been instructed to restrict movement.
<h4 data-start="3059" data-end="3096">Iran Issues Regional Warning</h4>
Tehran, for its part, has delivered a stark message to neighbouring states. Officials have warned Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Turkey that US bases operating from their soil would become legitimate targets if American forces attack Iran. This threat has heightened nervousness across the Gulf, where governments are quietly reviewing contingency plans.
Meanwhile, a US carrier strike group is being repositioned towards the Middle East theatre, reinforcing the perception that Washington is militarily posturing for rapid response.
<h4 data-start="3637" data-end="3680">Europe Pulls Back, Airlines Divert</h4>
European governments are also adjusting to the deteriorating security environment. Germany has issued new guidance cautioning airlines against entering Iranian airspace. Major carriers, including Lufthansa, have confirmed they will bypass Iranian and Iraqi routes until further notice. Some services to the wider region are now operating only during daylight hours, with warnings of further cancellations.
Britain has temporarily closed its embassy in Tehran, shifting operations to remote mode &mdash; a move that diplomats privately describe as precautionary but serious.
<h4 data-start="4260" data-end="4297">Opposition Seizes the Moment</h4>
From exile, Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi has attempted to shape the international narrative, presenting himself as a credible alternative to the current order. In a widely circulated message, he pledged that a future Iran would abandon any nuclear weapons ambition, end support for militant proxies, recognise Israel, and normalise ties with the West.
His remarks have resonated among sections of the diaspora and younger Iranians inside the country, but analysts caution that the internal political landscape remains fragmented, with no unified opposition structure yet capable of immediately filling a power vacuum.
<h4 data-start="4924" data-end="4960">A Nation Holding Its Breath</h4>
For now, Iran exists in a state of suspended anticipation. Airports have reopened, but confidence has not returned. Families continue to stockpile essentials. Conversations in caf&eacute;s, taxis and private homes inevitably turn to the same question: Is war hours away, or is this another psychological phase of pressure?
What is clear is that the convergence of domestic unrest, international military movements, diplomatic withdrawals and airspace instability marks one of the most dangerous moments for Iran and the wider Middle East in recent years.
The skies may have reopened, but the crisis remains firmly grounded in reality.

Tehran international airport closed file photo

Troop movements and embassy pullbacks signal rising risk of US-Iran clash

Tehran’s Skies Shut as Strike Fears Grip Iran

Iran is set to publicly execute a 26-year-old protester on Wednesday, marking the first death sentence carried out in connection with the ongoing anti-government protests that have gripped the country for nearly three weeks. The case has triggered global outrage, with rights groups warning of summary executions aimed at crushing dissent.
The victim, identified as Erfan Soltani, was detained on January 8 during demonstrations against Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. For several days after his arrest, his family had no information about his whereabouts. They were later informed by security officials that Soltani had already been sentenced to death and would be allowed a single meeting,limited to just 10 minutes, to say goodbye.
Authorities have reportedly charged Soltani with &ldquo;Moharebeh,&rdquo; or enmity against God, a charge frequently used in Iran against protesters and political dissidents and punishable by death. According to reports, the sentence was delivered without a public trial, formal charges, or access to legal representation.
The Integrated crackdown has raised alarms among international legal experts, who argue that the rapid timeline from arrest to execution violates Iran&rsquo;s own criminal procedures. Rights advocates say the case reflects what they describe as &ldquo;field executions,&rdquo; designed to instil fear and deter further protests.
The unrest in Iran began over soaring inflation and the collapse of the national currency but has since evolved into widespread demonstrations across more than 280 locations. Activists report thousands of deaths and tens of thousands of arrests amid an intense security crackdown, accompanied by prolonged internet shutdowns and restrictions on communication.
Amnesty International has cited Soltani&rsquo;s case as evidence that Iranian authorities may once again be resorting to swift trials and arbitrary executions to silence opposition. Experts warn that many similar cases could be unfolding out of public view due to censorship and fear-driven silence inside the country.
Human rights organisations note that Iran remains among the world&rsquo;s leading executioners, with hundreds of death sentences carried out annually, often linked to political repression. The execution of Erfan Soltani is being viewed as a stark signal of the regime&rsquo;s escalating response to nationwide dissent.

Family given 10 minutes for farewell as Iran intensifies protest crackdown

Iran to execute 26-year-old protester today

Gujarat Congress Internal Dispute: The countdown to the 2027 Gujarat Assembly election has already begun. The 2029 Lok Sabha election is not far away either. The Congress high command is making claims of a change of power in Gujarat. Rahul Gandhi is talking about rebuilding the Gujarat Congress from the ground up. There is talk of removing the &lsquo;lame horses&rsquo; and putting the &lsquo;race horses&rsquo; on the field. But looking at the current state of the Gujarat Congress, one question cannot be avoided: before entering the race, will the Congress even be able to get its own team to stand in one line? Before declaring war against the BJP, the Congress is caught in a political battle within its own house. The question is bitter, but necessary: if a party cannot create unity within its own organisation, how does it expect to take on the BJP&rsquo;s formidable organisational machinery in Gujarat?
Leaders Changed, But Why Didn&rsquo;t the Problem? Keeping the 2027 Assembly and 2029 Lok Sabha elections in mind, the Congress has begun making changes to its Gujarat organisation. The high command wanted to remove the old and inactive structure and bring forward leaders with the ability to fight elections. But when a party repeatedly needs to change its state in-charge, the question becomes bigger than the capability of the individual holding the post. Mukul Wasnik was replaced by Randeep Singh Surjewala as Gujarat Congress in-charge. With the new in-charge came expectations of a new direction, a new strategy and greater discipline within the organisation. Yet, barely had Surjewala taken charge when a controversy erupted within Banaskantha Congress over the organisational structure. That is where the Congress&rsquo;s real trouble begins.
A Symptom of Congress&rsquo;s Organisational Illness Banaskantha is not an ordinary constituency. It is the only Lok Sabha seat in Gujarat that the Congress won in the 2024 general election. That makes it the biggest symbol of political hope for the Congress in Gujarat. So when differences emerge over organisational posts and responsibilities in precisely this constituency, when questions are raised over decisions taken by the state leadership, and when the district organisation itself becomes a subject of controversy, this cannot simply be dismissed as a &lsquo;local dispute&rsquo;. It is a symptom of the Congress&rsquo;s organisational illness. And if this illness continues until 2027, the BJP will be the direct beneficiary. The Congress needs to understand one basic reality: elections are not won through posters, press conferences and speeches by big leaders. Elections are won at the booth. The BJP&rsquo;s organisational machinery is active right down to the booth level. To challenge it, the Congress needs a strong network of workers, clearly defined responsibilities and a united district-level organisation. But here, the very formation of the district organisation is becoming a source of controversy. So where exactly will the Congress find the strength to challenge the BJP at the booth level?
&lsquo;Race Horses&rsquo; or Obstacles in Each Other&rsquo;s Way? Rahul Gandhi talks about identifying the &lsquo;lame horses&rsquo; in Gujarat and bringing the &lsquo;race horses&rsquo; to the forefront. It sounds attractive. But politics does not work that way. Simply choosing good horses does not guarantee victory in a race. The horses must run together rather than pull each other down. The direction of the race must be clear. And the coaching staff cannot be fighting among themselves. Only then can a team win. The Gujarat Congress&rsquo;s problem may not simply be about &lsquo;which leader should be promoted&rsquo;. The real problem is whether the leaders who are brought forward will actually work together. Mukul Wasnik is gone. Randeep Singh Surjewala has arrived. The state in-charge has changed. But if factionalism remains unchanged, internal power struggles remain unchanged, coordination between the district and state organisations remains weak, and organisational decisions themselves continue to trigger controversy, then what exactly is the Congress talking about when it talks of change? Changing faces will not change the Congress&rsquo;s fortunes. Its working style must change. Leadership accountability must be fixed. Factionalism must be brought under control. And above all, the party worker must be given confidence that the Congress is genuinely one team. Because if the Congress wants to fight the BJP, it must first stop its own leaders from fighting each other.
When Will the Political Infighting Within Gujarat Congress End? The biggest illusion for the Congress in the 2027 election would be to assume that public anger against the BJP will automatically translate into Congress votes. Politics does not work that simply. Reaching voters requires sustained ground-level work. It requires a booth-level organisation. It requires coordination among local leaders. It requires worker morale. And above all, it requires leadership running in one direction until election day. If even one of these five links is weak, the entire electoral calculation can collapse. For the Congress, this is no longer the time for experiments. It is the time for decisions. How many state in-charges will be changed? How many meetings will be held? How many times will the organisational structure be reshuffled? The question is no longer who the next Gujarat Congress in-charge will be. The real question is: when will the political infighting within the Gujarat Congress finally end? If every new in-charge is going to inherit the same old disputes, factionalism and internal resentment, then how can a new Congress emerge simply because a new face has arrived?
Will &lsquo;Race Horses&rsquo; Remain Just Another Political Slogan? If the Congress wants to win Gujarat, it must first win within its own organisation. It must win the trust of its workers. It must win the confidence of its district organisations. It must bring its leaders onto one platform. Otherwise, the Congress will lose its internal battle before its fight against the BJP has even begun. And then the talk of &lsquo;race horses&rsquo; will remain nothing more than another political slogan. The Congress has very little time left in the race for power in 2027. If it wants to take on the BJP, it must first stop its own leaders from fighting each other. Because power in Gujarat will not be won through statements from the Gandhi family. It will be won through organisational strength on the ground. The final question is simple: Is the Congress preparing to defeat the BJP, or is it still calculating whom it needs to defeat inside its own house? Want to win Gujarat? Then first, win the Gujarat Congress.

Congress has set its sights on defeating the BJP in Gujarat. But there’s a bigger battle brewing inside its own house.

Congress Wants to Defeat BJP in Gujarat, But Who Will Save Congress From Itself?

Gujarat High Court Launches Study Circle for Advocates: In a major initiative to strengthen the professional skills and legal knowledge of young advocates, the High Court of Gujarat, in collaboration with the Gujarat State Judicial Academy (GSJA), has announced the launch of a Study Circle (Symposium/Workshop) for Advocates Practicing before the High Court of Gujarat with up to 10 years of practice. The programme will be conducted at the Lecture Hall of the Gujarat State Judicial Academy, High Court Campus, Ahmedabad.
Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal Announces Study Circle The initiative was announced by Gujarat High Court Chief Justice and Patron-in-Chief of the Gujarat State Judicial Academy, Justice Sunita Agarwal, after the Flag Hoisting Ceremony held at the High Court Lawns on August 15. The announcement was made in the presence of Justice Bhargav D. Karia, Judge of the Gujarat High Court and President of GSJA, members of the Board of Governors of GSJA, other High Court judges, Senior Advocates and members of the Bar.
Focus on Legal Education and Professional Skills The new Study Circle is being introduced as a continuous legal learning and professional development programme for young members of the Bar. The initiative aims to enhance advocates&rsquo; understanding of legal principles, legal research, drafting and advocacy skills through direct interaction with Senior Advocates and subject experts. The programme is also expected to strengthen academic engagement between the Bench and the Bar and provide advocates with an opportunity to discuss important and evolving legal issues.
Justice Sunita Agarwal Highlights Importance of Continuous Learning Addressing the gathering, Chief Justice Sunita Agarwal highlighted the indispensable role of advocates in the administration of justice. She emphasized that continuous legal education has become increasingly important in an era of rapidly evolving jurisprudence. The Chief Justice also stressed that effective advocacy and strong legal research are essential components of a robust justice delivery system. She appreciated the efforts of the Gujarat State Judicial Academy in conceptualizing and developing the Study Circle programme.
Three Key Legal Modules in First Phase The first phase of the Study Circle will feature three major academic modules covering important areas of High Court practice. Module I will focus on the expanding contours of maintainability in writ jurisdiction under Article 226, an important area of constitutional and administrative law practice. Module II will cover the basic principles of Administrative Law and Second Appeals under Section 100 of the CPC, with particular emphasis on the Doctrine of Substantial Question of Law. Module III will focus on Criminal Law Jurisdiction, particularly the inherent powers of High Courts under Section 482 of the CrPC and Section 528 of the BNSS, including their scope, limitations and principles of judicial discipline.
Study Circle to Be Held Fortnightly The Study Circle is proposed to be conducted on a fortnightly basis, providing advocates with regular opportunities for legal learning and professional interaction. Future sessions will cover a wide range of subjects, including Constitutional Law, Writ Jurisdiction, Arbitration and Conciliation Law, Commercial Law, Public Interest Litigation, Service Law, Taxation Law, Admiralty Jurisdiction, Legal Ethics and Drafting Skills. The programme will also address contemporary legal issues that are particularly relevant to advocates practicing before the Gujarat High Court.
Registration to Begin Soon Registration for the Study Circle (Symposium/Workshop Series) for Advocates Practicing in the High Court of Gujarat &ndash; Series of Academic Modules 2026 will begin shortly through the official website of the Gujarat State Judicial Academy. The programme is specifically intended for advocates practicing before the Gujarat High Court who have up to 10 years of professional practice.
Registration Fee The registration fee for the Study Circle has been fixed at ₹100 per programme, which will be paid by each participating advocate. The workshops will be conducted at the Lecture Hall of the Gujarat State Judicial Academy, High Court Campus, Ahmedabad. Advocates attending the workshops will also receive Certificates of Participation.
Major Step Towards Strengthening Justice Delivery The Gujarat High Court and Gujarat State Judicial Academy's new Study Circle is being viewed as a significant step towards professional excellence and development of the legal fraternity. By bringing young advocates, Senior Advocates and legal experts together for regular academic discussions, the initiative aims to improve legal knowledge, research and advocacy skills while strengthening the Bench-Bar relationship. The broader objective is to contribute towards a more effective and efficient justice delivery system in Gujarat.

Study Circle Launched for Advocates With Up to 10 Years of Practice

Gujarat High Court Big Move

A chilling video of the accused in the Indore MBA student murder case has sparked outrage after he was seen smiling and appearing unconcerned when questioned about the crime.
The accused, Piyush Dhanotia, was arrested for allegedly raping and murdering his 25-year-old classmate in Indore, Madhya Pradesh. Police said he strangled the woman on February 10 inside his rented accommodation and later locked the room before fleeing. Her partially decomposed body was discovered days later after residents complained of a foul smell.
However, what has intensified public anger is the accused&rsquo;s demeanour. In a video that surfaced online, Dhanotia is seen smiling when reporters ask him why he committed the crime. When pressed for answers, he responded dismissively, saying that what had happened had already happened and that he would speak at the right time. Throughout the interaction, he showed no visible sign of regret.
Police officials said he admitted during interrogation that he forced the woman into sexual acts and killed her when she resisted, though he has reportedly changed his version multiple times. Investigators are also examining allegations that he circulated objectionable videos of the victim in their college WhatsApp group.
The victim&rsquo;s father has accused the accused of blackmailing his daughter with obscene images and attempting to extort money.
As the investigation continues, the accused&rsquo;s apparent lack of remorse captured on camera has become a focal point of the case, drawing sharp reactions both online and offline.
&nbsp;

Video shows MBA student murder accused laughing amid probe

Indore Murder Accused Smiles on Camera

Galgotias University has landed in controversy after showcasing a robotic dog at the India AI Impact Summit 2026 that was widely believed to be developed by its students. The robot, however, was later identified as a commercially available product made by Chinese robotics firm Unitree Robotics.
The backlash began after a video from the summit went viral, in which a university professor introduced the robot dog, named &ldquo;Orion,&rdquo; and referred to it as being developed at the institution&rsquo;s Centre of Excellence. Social media users were quick to point out that the machine closely resembled Unitree&rsquo;s quadruped robots, which are already available globally for research and industrial use.
Unitree is known for manufacturing advanced four-legged robots designed for tasks such as inspection, obstacle navigation and research applications. Its products are often compared to models developed by global robotics players.
Following the uproar, the Greater Noida-based university issued a clarification stating that it never claimed to have built the robot. It maintained that the robodog was purchased as part of its AI investment initiatives and is being used as a research and learning tool for students. Another faculty member present at the summit reiterated that the display had been misinterpreted and that there was no attempt to conceal the original manufacturer&rsquo;s branding.
Despite the clarification, sources familiar with the developments said the university was asked to vacate its pavilion at the summit amid mounting criticism. The institution, however, denied receiving any formal directive from the organisers or the ministry.
Notably, the robotic dog was removed from display shortly after the controversy escalated online.

Robodog row sparks backlash at India AI Impact Summit 2026

Galgotias Asked to Exit AI Summit

Actor Sidharth Malhotra is mourning the loss of his father, Sunil Malhotra, who passed away recently. The actor shared the news with an emotional message on social media. His wife, Kiara Advani, has now also paid a heartfelt tribute to her father-in-law.
On Wednesday, Kiara took to Instagram to share pictures from her wedding reception, where she and Sidharth were seen smiling alongside his parents. In a deeply personal note, she remembered Sunil Malhotra as a warm, generous, and steady presence in the family. She reflected on how he welcomed her with open arms and unconditional love, describing his kindness, wisdom, and unwavering devotion to his family.
Kiara wrote that his stories, laughter, and quiet strength would remain with her forever. She added that his legacy of integrity and gentleness lives on through his children and grandchildren. Concluding her message, she expressed that he would always be loved and remembered.
The couple is currently in Delhi with their family during this difficult period. Members of the film industry extended their condolences online. Jacqueline Fernandez offered prayers, while Karan Johar and Manish Malhotra shared messages of support.
On the professional front, Sidharth will next appear in Vvan: Force of The Forest, directed by Arunabh Kumar and Deepak Mishra and produced by Balaji Motion Pictures. The film also stars Tamannaah Bhatia and is slated for release later this year.
Kiara, meanwhile, awaits the release of Toxic: A Fairytale for Grown-Ups, directed by Geetu Mohandas. The film features Yash, Nayanthara, Tara Sutaria, Huma Qureshi, and Rukmini Vasanth in key roles. The film is expected to release on March 19, alongside Dhurandhar 2, directed by Aditya Dhar.

Actor pens heartfelt note after Sunil Malhotra’s passing

Kiara Mourns Sidharth’s Father

Days after 23-year-old Sahil Dhaneshra lost his life in a fatal SUV crash in Delhi&rsquo;s Dwarka, the father of the 17-year-old accused has expressed regret over the incident, stating that his family is &ldquo;deeply grief-stricken.&rdquo; He also confirmed that the Scorpio SUV involved in the accident is part of his commercial transport business.
The crash occurred around 11:50 am on February 3 near Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of Management in Sector 11, Dwarka. According to police, the SUV rammed into a Yamaha R15 motorcycle, killing Sahil on the spot. The vehicle then struck a parked Swift Dzire, injuring cab driver Ajit Singh.
Post-mortem findings revealed that Sahil sustained a fractured skull, multiple rib fractures, and an elbow injury due to the high-impact collision.
The minor driver was detained at the scene and booked under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for rash driving, negligence causing death, and endangering life. He was later presented before the Juvenile Justice Board and sent to an observation home. On February 10, he was granted interim bail to appear for his Class 10 board examinations.
Meanwhile, the Delhi Police registered a separate case against the boy&rsquo;s father under Section 199A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which holds guardians or vehicle owners accountable when a minor commits a traffic offence.
Speaking to the media after being questioned, the father said he was not in the city at the time of the accident and was unaware that his son had taken the vehicle. He stated that the family has cooperated with investigators and provided all necessary documents.
Sahil&rsquo;s mother alleged that her son was killed by a &ldquo;reckless teen&rdquo; just minutes away from his workplace. The 23-year-old, who worked part-time at an insurance firm, had plans to pursue higher studies in the United Kingdom later this year.

Minor held in SUV crash; father booked under MV Act provisions

Dwarka Crash: Accused’s Father Apologises

The Supreme Court of India on Tuesday set aside a March 2025 judgment of the Allahabad High Court that had ruled that grabbing a minor girl&rsquo;s breasts and dragging her under a culvert did not amount to an attempt to rape. The apex court termed the ruling a &ldquo;patently erroneous&rdquo; application of criminal law principles.
A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, along with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and N.V. Anjaria, held that the high court had incorrectly reduced the charges from attempt to rape under Section 376 read with Section 511 of the IPC and Section 18 of the POCSO Act to lesser offences. The court restored the original summons issued by the Special POCSO Court in Kasganj, clarifying that its observations were prima facie and would not influence the trial&rsquo;s outcome.
Rejecting the high court&rsquo;s reasoning that the accused had merely &ldquo;prepared&rdquo; to commit rape, the Supreme Court reiterated the settled distinction between preparation and attempt, noting that an attempt begins when intent moves into execution. Based on the allegations, including forcibly taking the minor on a motorcycle, dragging her near a culvert, and fleeing only after she screamed, the Bench held that a prima facie case of attempt to rape was clearly made out.
The proceedings were initiated suo motu after senior advocate Shobha Gupta raised concerns over the high court&rsquo;s reasoning. The Supreme Court had earlier stayed the controversial observations and later the entire judgment.
Beyond correcting the legal error, the court addressed a broader concern about insensitivity in judicial handling of sexual offence cases. It requested the National Judicial Academy in Bhopal to constitute a five-member expert committee to frame guidelines aimed at fostering compassion and sensitivity in courts, especially in cases involving minors and vulnerable victims.
The committee, to be chaired by former Supreme Court judge Justice Aniruddha Bose, has been directed to submit a report within three months. The guidelines are to be drafted in simple, accessible language and tailored to Indian realities to ensure they are understandable to victims and laypersons alike.

Top court restores rape attempt charge, seeks sensitivity guidelines

SC Sets Aside HC Order in POCSO Case

India&rsquo;s merchandise imports from Russia plunged by over 40% in January 2026, falling to about $2.86 billion from $4.81 billion a year earlier, official trade figures show, largely reflecting a steep reduction in crude oil purchases.
Crude oil typically accounts for roughly 80% of India&rsquo;s imports from Russia, and estimates suggest purchases of Russian crude last month were significantly lower than in previous years. Other goods imported from Russia include coal, fertilisers, iron, pulses, and precious stones, but these have not offset the slump in oil imports. The downturn in oil imports intensified after mid-2025, following punitive tariffs levied by the United States on Indian goods connected to purchases of Russian oil and ongoing diplomatic pressure. India&rsquo;s refiners, including some major private and state firms, have substantially reduced or halted buying Russian crude as they explore alternative sources.
In early February 2026, Washington eased the additional tariff on Indian products after New Delhi signalled a commitment to &ldquo;stop directly or indirectly importing&rdquo; Russian oil and to increase purchases of energy products from the United States, as well as broadening ties in global energy markets.
Analysts expect the shift in crude sourcing to continue, with Indian refiners eyeing other suppliers, including Middle Eastern and Venezuelan grades, as part of broader diversification strategies.

January sees 40% fall in Russia merchandise imports amid crude cutbacks

India’s Russia Imports Drop Sharply

A 27-year-old man has been arrested in Andhra Pradesh&rsquo;s Annamayya district for allegedly abducting and murdering a seven-year-old girl from his neighbourhood in Madanapalle town.
The child had been playing outside her home on Sunday evening when she went missing, sparking panic among her family and local residents. A missing complaint was filed the following morning, prompting an intensive search operation led by district police.
Investigators reviewed CCTV footage from across the town, which reportedly showed the suspect, a neighbour living opposite the victim&rsquo;s house, taking the child into his residence. Acting on this lead, police searched the house on Tuesday morning.
During the inspection, officers discovered the girl&rsquo;s body concealed inside a water storage drum within the premises. The accused was present at the house at the time and was immediately taken into custody.
Preliminary findings suggest the child was killed inside the residence on Sunday night, and her body was hidden thereafter. Authorities are probing whether sexual assault occurred before the murder, with confirmation pending post-mortem and forensic examination results.
Following the discovery, tensions escalated in the area. Residents and family members staged a protest on the Madanapalle highway, briefly preventing police from shifting the body to the government hospital for autopsy and demanding strict punishment for the accused.
Police have stated that all possible angles, including prior allegations of inappropriate behaviour by the suspect, are being examined as the investigation continues.

Child’s body found in drum; protest erupts in Madanapalle town

7-Year-Old Killed, Neighbour Arrested

The United States and Iran held their second round of indirect negotiations in Geneva, Switzerland, as diplomatic efforts continue amid heightened regional tensions. While both sides indicated forward movement in discussions, parallel military developments have added complexity to the fragile engagement.
Reports suggest the US has significantly reinforced its military presence in the Middle East. Over 50 advanced fighter aircraft, including F-35, F-22 and F-16 jets, were reportedly repositioned to the region within a 24-hour window. The deployment follows Washington&rsquo;s decision to send a second aircraft carrier, the USS Gerald R. Ford, to Middle Eastern waters, underscoring its strategic posture.
Despite the show of force, the Geneva discussions were described as substantive and focused. Iranian officials signalled that preliminary understandings were reached on broad guiding principles that could shape a future agreement. However, they cautioned that drafting and finalising any deal would take time.
On the American side, officials maintained that the talks unfolded largely as anticipated. Washington&rsquo;s core objective remains preventing Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons, a position repeatedly emphasised by senior US leadership.
Meanwhile, regional tensions persisted. Iran temporarily restricted navigation in parts of the Strait of Hormuz during a naval drill, highlighting the waterway&rsquo;s vulnerability. Additionally, US leaders suggested that differences remain over key conditions laid out by President Donald Trump.
As diplomacy continues, both nations appear to be balancing dialogue with deterrence, leaving the broader geopolitical landscape uncertain.

Second Geneva round shows progress as military moves raise stakes

Tehran News